
ArborGen states that their GE trees are great in many ways, including more wood per acre, thus freeing up more acreage for naturally occuring trees, they have been engineered to not need as much water as other eucalyptus, and they are very fast growing. ArborGen is affiliated with three large paper companies, International Paper, MedaWestvaco, and Rubicon Ltd. Being able to produce more wood per acre, in a much faster time frame is a benefit of GE trees.
From a biocentric aspect, I feel that all living things have a value of their own. There is a reason they are the way they are, and their value lies in their naturalness. From an ecotentric aspect, species and ecosystems have an intrinsic value of their own. They are valuable the way they are, and should not be artifically altered. There are concerns with violating the intergrity of species. I feel that if these trees were meant to grow in a cold environment, they would be able to tolerate it naturally.

Since their introduction to California, these trees have been implicated in the decrease in biodiversity of native plants, birds, and animals. The longhorned beetle was brought into California on a sapling, causing widespread destruction. With no natural predators, the beetle flourished. Then someone decided to introduce the syngaster lepidue wasp to kill the beetle. Now we have three non-native species in California. What implications does this have long term? What native plants and animals will be destroyed because of these GE trees? If they grow so quickly, are hard to get rid of, spread fast, and are now freeze tolerant, who is to say they won't take over the US? The kudzu is an example of an invasive plant that has flourished. The threat to SW Florida is great if this GE tree were to spread.
I don't feel that the benefit of these trees outweighs the risk. I feel that money from the paper companies is the driving force. I do not believe there are any reasonable steps to be taken to mitigate the risk from these invasive trees. Corporate greed cannot be allowed to dictate responsible ecology.
No comments:
Post a Comment